As more patients live with hip and knee replacements for decades, orthopedic surgeons increasingly encounter a specific injury pattern: a fracture that occurs around, or adjacent to, an existing joint implant. Known as a periprosthetic fracture, this type of break introduces a layer of complexity beyond a typical fracture, because the surgical plan must account for both the broken bone and the implant already in place. This article outlines how these fractures are generally understood, what factors guide treatment planning, and where fixation strategies fit into the broader picture.
What Is a Periprosthetic Fracture?
A periprosthetic fracture is a break in the bone surrounding a previously implanted prosthesis, most commonly discussed in relation to hip and knee replacements. These fractures can occur from a fall, from repetitive stress concentrated near the implant-bone interface, or in association with loosening of the prosthesis over time. Because the existing implant occupies space within the bone and alters its normal load-bearing pattern, a fracture in this location is generally treated differently than a fracture in a bone that has never been operated on.
Why Are Periprosthetic Fractures Considered More Complex?
Several factors are commonly cited as contributing to the complexity of periprosthetic fracture care. The presence of the implant itself limits the available bone stock and the options for where new fixation hardware, such as screws or a nail, can be placed without conflicting with the existing prosthesis. Bone quality around long-standing implants can also be altered, whether due to stress shielding, prior surgical trauma, or age-related bone loss, which may affect how well new fixation holds. Additionally, surgeons must assess whether the original implant is still well-fixed and stable or whether it has loosened, since a loose implant may itself need to be addressed as part of the fracture treatment rather than left in place.
How Are Periprosthetic Fractures Generally Classified?
Classification systems for periprosthetic fractures, such as those commonly used for hip and knee prostheses, generally organize fractures based on the fracture's location relative to the implant and, importantly, whether the implant itself remains well-fixed within the bone. This classification approach is widely used in orthopedic literature because it directly informs treatment strategy — a fracture near a stable implant may be managed differently than a similar fracture pattern occurring around a loose one. A qualified physician reviews imaging and clinical findings to determine which category best fits an individual patient's fracture before selecting a treatment path.
What Fixation Strategies Are Commonly Considered?
When the existing implant remains well-fixed, fixation strategies commonly discussed include specialized plates designed to accommodate the implant's presence, sometimes combined with cables, cerclage wires, or screws placed around or alongside the prosthesis. When the implant itself has loosened or is no longer adequately supporting the joint, revision surgery — replacing all or part of the original implant with a new prosthesis, sometimes combined with fracture fixation — may be discussed as part of the treatment plan. The specific approach depends heavily on fracture location, implant stability, bone quality, and the patient's overall health, and represents a collaborative decision between the surgical team and patient.
Where Do Trauma Implants Fit Into Periprosthetic Fracture Care?
Plating systems used in periprosthetic fracture fixation are often adapted from broader trauma plate families, since the general engineering principles — appropriate screw purchase, adequate plate length to bypass stress risers, and biocompatible materials — apply similarly to periprosthetic and standard trauma fractures alike. Titanium locking plate systems, such as those within the CytroFIX line manufactured by Cytronics (an INVAMED orthopedic division), are built with a range of plate lengths and locking screw options that may be relevant to certain periprosthetic fracture patterns, depending on surgeon assessment. The full range of trauma plating and fixation options can be reviewed on the INVAMED orthopedic and trauma solutions category page, with indications always confirmed against the applicable Instructions for Use (IFU).
Does a periprosthetic fracture always mean the implant needs to be replaced?
Not necessarily. If the original implant remains well-fixed and stable, surgeons may be able to treat the fracture with plating or other fixation methods around the existing prosthesis rather than performing a full revision. The decision depends on implant stability and fracture location as assessed by the surgical team.
What increases the likelihood of a periprosthetic fracture?
Falls are a commonly cited cause, and factors such as reduced bone density, implant loosening over time, and certain stress patterns around the implant-bone junction are generally discussed as contributing considerations. Individual risk factors vary and are best evaluated by a treating physician.
What symptoms suggest a periprosthetic fracture after a fall?
Sudden pain around a previous joint replacement, inability to bear weight, visible deformity, or swelling following a fall are reasons to seek immediate medical care for evaluation and imaging. Prompt assessment helps determine whether a fracture has occurred and what treatment path is appropriate.
Device availability and regulatory status vary by country. Please contact INVAMED or your authorized local distributor for current regulatory information applicable to your region.